نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیارگروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت منابع سازمانی، دانشگاه امین، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت منابع سازمانی، دانشگاه امین، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد رشته مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه دانش البرز، قزوین، ایران

چکیده

دموکراسی سازمانی بیانگر موقعیتی است که در آن سازمان به کارکنان خود فرصت مشارکت در امر اداره سازمانی را داده و شرایط سهمیم شدن در تصمیم گیری های سازمانی را مهیا سازد. با توجه به تنوع و تغییر پذیری مفهوم دموکراسی سازمانی، این پژوهش بدنبال تفسیر این پدیده با رویکرد پدیدارنگاری می باشد. فلسفه پژوهش تفسیری بوده، روش اجرای آن کیفی و از گونه پدیدارنگاری است. روش گردآوری داده ها، میدانی و از ابزار مصاحبه استفاده شده است. جامعه مشارکت کنندگان تحقیق کارکنان سازمان تامین اجتماعی بوده که به روش بیشینه تنوع نمونه گیری شده و با 32 نفر مصاحبه انجام شده است. براساس تحلیل یافته های تحقیق مشخص گردید هشت روش تجربه کردن دموکراسی در محیط سازمانی وجود دارد که شامل: شکوفایی، تحقق اراده عامه، قدرت تغییر فرایند، حاکمیت قانون، اخلاق حرفه ای، توانمندسازی کارکنان، تصمیم گیری مشارکتی و پاسخگویی به ارباب رجوع، می باشد. براساس یافته های تحقیق، طبقات توصیفی در پنج سطح توسعه فردی (شکوفایی و توانمندسازی)، فرایندمحوری (تصمیم گیری مشارکتی و قدرت تغییر فرایند)، فرهنگ محوری (حاکمیت قانون و اخلاق حرفه ای)، مدیریت سازمانی (تحقق اراده عامه) و جامعه محوری (پاسخگویی به ارباب رجوع) قرار می گیرد که نشانه وجود تفاوت ساختاری و سلسله مراتبی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Phenomenography of democracy in the organization

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Alizadeh 1
  • Masoud Shariati 2
  • Parviz Noroozirad 3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Organizational Resource Management, Amin University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Organizational Resource Management, Amin University, Tehran, Iran

3 Master of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Danesh Alborz University, Qazvin, Iran

چکیده [English]

Organizational democracy situation in which the organization gives its employees the opportunity to participate in the organization's management and provides the conditions for participation in organizational decisions. Considering the diversity of the concept of organizational democracy, this research seeks to understand and interpret this phenomenon with a phenomenography approach. The data collection method is field and interview tool is used. The community of participants of the research was the employees of the Social Security Organization, which was sampled by the maximum diversity method and 32 employee were interviewed. Based on the analysis of the research findings, it was determined that there are eight methods of experiencing democracy in the organizational environment, which include: Thriving, realization of public will, power to change the process, rule of law, professional ethics, employee empowerment, collaborative decision-making and responding to clients. Based on research findings, descriptive classes in five levels of personal development (Thriving and empowerment), process-oriented (participatory decision-making and the power to change the process), culture-oriented (rule of law and professional ethics), organizational management (realization of public will) And society-oriented (answering to clients), which is a sign of the existence of structural and hierarchical differences in addition to their semantic differences.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Democracy
  • Phenomenography
  • Public Will
  • Pluralism
  1. دانایی فرد، حسن و کاظمی، سیدحسین. ( 1390). پژوهش های تفسیری در سازمان: استراتژی های پدیدارشناسی و پدیدارنگاری. نشر دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)
  2. مجرب، الهام، لگزیان، محمد و مرتضوی، سعید. (1397). پدیدارنگاری مدیریت ارتباط با شهروند. نشریه فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، (31)4، 193-133http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3208-fa.html
  3. Ahmed, K., Adeel, A., Ali, R. & Rehman, R. U. (2019). Organizational democracy and employee outcomes: The mediating role of organizational justice. Business Strategy and Development, 1-16 http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3208-fa.html
  4. Anderson, E. (2017). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  5. Assarroudi, A. & Heydari, A. (2016). Phenomenography: A Missed Method in Medical Research. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Medicine in Nis, 33(3), 217-225.doi: 1515/afmnai-2016-0023
  6. Atac, L. O. & Kose, S. (2017). The Relationship between Organizational Democracy and Organizational Opposition: White Collars A Research on. Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration magazine, 46(1), 117-132.
  7. Battilana, J., Yen, J., Ferreras, I.& Ramarajan, L. (2022). Democratizing Work: Redistributing power in organizations for a democratic and sustainable future. Organization Theory, 3, 1-21.https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221084714
  8. Breen, K., & Hirvonen, O. (2020). Recognitive Arguments for Workplace Democracy. Constellations, 27(4), 716-731.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12487
  9. Blige, H., Barbuta-Misu, N., Zungun, D., Virlanuta, F.O. & Guven, H. (2020). Organizational Democracy in the Private Sector: A Field Research, Sustainability, 12, 1-16.doi:10.3390/su12083446
  10. Borve, H.E. & Kvande, E. (2022). The Translation of Nordic Workplace Democracy to the United States. Nordic journal of working life studies, 12 (3). 45-61.https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/index
  11. Butcher, D. & Clarke, M. (2002). Organizational Politics: The cornerstone for organizational democracy. Organizational Dynamics, 31 (1), 35-46.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00070-0
  12. Clegg, S., ve Bailey, J.R. (2007). International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies: SAGE Publications.
  13. Cortes, J.J. (2019). Process, Theory, and Practice in Direct Democracy: Avenues for New Research. Politics & Policy. 1-26.doi:10.1111/polp.12317
  14. Cosan, E. & Gülova, A. (2014). Organizational Democracy, Governance and Economy, 21(2), 231-248.
  15. Coutinho, J. (2016).Workplace Democracy, Well-Being and Political Participation. A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities.
  16. Eidlin, B. & Uetricht, M. (2018). The problem of workplace democracy. New Labor Forum, 27 (1), 70-79.doi: 10.1177/1095796017745037
  17. Eris, H. & Bucak, F. (2018). New Approaches in Health Sciences. Iksad Publishing house.
  18. Geckil, T. (2022) Perceived Organizational Democracy and Associated Factors: A Focused Systematic Review Based on Studies in Turkey. Systematic Review, 13, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767469
  19. Geckil, T., & Tikici, M. (2016). Hospital employees' organizational democracy perceptions and its effects on organizational citizenship behaviors. Asian Pacific J. Health Sci. 3, 123–136.doi: 20491/isarder.2017.351
  20. Geckil, T., Akpinar, A. T., & Tas, Y. (2017). The Effect of organizational democracy on job satisfaction: a field research. Business Stud. 9, 649–674doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767469
  21. Grabowski, M. T. (2022). AN investigation of organizational democracy as a predictor of hierarchy attenuation through individual participation in organization decision making. Degree doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Psychology Indiana University.
  22. Hajar, A. (2020). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography: a critical review, Higher Education Research & Development, 40 (2), 1421-1436.doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844
  23. Harrison, J.S. and R.E. Freeman. (2004). Is Organizational Democracy Worth the Effort? Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 49-53.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166091
  24. Hirvonen, O. & Breen, K. (2020). Recognitive arguments forworkplace democracy. Costellations, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12487
  25. Hyman, R. (2016). The very idea of democracy at work. Transfer, 22 (1), 11-24.doi: 10.1177/1024258915619283
  26. Khan, S.H. (2014). Phenomenography: A qualitative research methodology in Bangladesh. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(2), 34-43.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274642143
  27. Larsson, J. & Holmstrom, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105
  28. Lee M. Y., Edmondson A. C. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002
  29. Manville, B. & Ober, j. (2003). Beyond Empowerment: Building a Company of Citizens. Harvard Business Review, 81 (1), 48-53.
  30. https://hbr.org/2003/01/beyond-empowerment-building-a-company-of-citizens
  31. Moriarty, J.,( 2010). Participation in the Workplace: Are Employees Special? Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (3), 373-384.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25621570
  32. Nielsen, R. P. (2015). Workplace Democracy. Business Ethics, 2, 1-15.
  33. Odiwo, W. O., Agol, N. M., Egielewa, P. E., Ebhote, O., Akhor, S. O., Ogbeide, F. & Ozuomode, D. C. (2022). WORKPLACE democracy and employee productivity in construction firms. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6 (4), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i4p4
  34. Palladino, L. (2021). Economic Democracy at Work: Why (and How) Workers Should be Represented on US Corporate Boards. Journal of Law and Political Economy, 1 (3). 373-396.doi:10.5070/LP61353763
  35. Park, S. (2021). Gendered leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: how democracy and representation moderate leadership effectiveness. Public Management Review, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937294
  36. Pausch, M. (2013). Workplace Democracy From a Democratic Ideal to a Managerial Tool and Back. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19 (1), 1-19.https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/workplace-democracy-democratic-ideal-managerial/docview/1528857458/se-2
  37. Petersson, M., & Spangs, A. (2005). Semco and Freys: A multiple-case study of workplace democracy (Student thesis).
  38. Rosali, L. J., Erojo, K. & Dicto, P. J. (2022). Gains and Losses: A Phenomenographic Study on Adolescents’ Understanding of Isolation due to COVID-19. Resarch Square.
  39. Sadykova, G. & Tutar, H. (2014). A Study on the Relationship Between Organizational Democracy and Organizational Opposition, Journal of Business Science, 2(1): 1- 16.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jobs/issue/22918/245405
  40. Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. J.Qual. Methods 9, 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900401
  41. Verdorfer, A.P. & Weber, W. G. (2016). Examining the link between organizational democracy and employees’ moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 45 (1), 59-73.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjme20
  42. Weber, W.G., Unterrainer, c. & Hoge, T. (2020). Psychological Research on Organisational Democracy: A Meta-Analysis of Individual, Organisational, and Societal Outcomes. Applied psychology: an international review, 69 (3), 1009–1071. doi:1111/apps.12205