نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی ،دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی ، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی ، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی ، دانشگاه شیراز،شیراز،ایران

چکیده

این روزها بسیاری از محققان این ایده را می‌پذیرند که دوجانبه گرایی سازمانی- توانایی بهره‌برداری از منابع موجود همزمان کاوش اطلاعات جدید - کلید بقای سازمانی است. هدف اصلی این مطالعه بررسی تاثیر مکانیسم‌های هماهنگی رسمی و غیر رسمی در دوجانبه گرایی فردی با بررسی تجربی بین 114 شرکت دانش بنیان درحوزه الکترونیک است. درحوزه مکانیسم های رسمی میزان قدرت تصمیم گیری فردی و رسمیت وظیفه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. یک آنالیز شبکه اجتماعی برای اندازه‌گیری سه مکانیسم غیر رسمی، پیوستگی شبکه، ناهمگنی و غیررسمی بودن روابط شبکه انجام شد. هر دوی تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تاییدی برای تایید ساختارها مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. روابط فرضیه ها براساس آنالیز رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی تست شدند. نتایج نشان داد که دو فرضیه اصلی می‌تواند تایید شود. یک رابطه U معکوس بین رسمی سازی کار و دوجانبه گرایی فردی یافت شد. این مطالعه در سطح فردی انجام شده و نتایج آن قابل تعمیم ، بررسی و استفاده در سطوح سازمانی می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Examination of the effect of formal and informal coordination mechanisms on individual

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mir Ali Seyed Naghavi 1
  • Alireza Koushkie Jahromi 2
  • Somaye Lalegani 3

1 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Student in Human Resource Management, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Nowadays, many researchers accept the idea that organizational ambidexterity- the ability to exploit existing resources at the same time to explore new information - is key to organizational survival. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of formal and informal coordination mechanisms in individual ambidexterity by empirical examination of 114 firms in the field of electronics. The scope of formal mechanisms was evaluated by individual decision - making authority and duty recognition. A social network analysis was conducted to measure three informal mechanisms, network continuity, heterogeneity, and informal of network relationships. both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to confirm the structures. The hypotheses were tested based on the hierarchical regression analysis. the results showed that two main hypotheses could be confirmed. A reverse U - correlation was found between individual professionalism and professionalism. this study is carried out at the individual level and its results are generalizable, review and use at organizational levels

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Individual ambidexterity
  • formal and informal coordination mechanisms
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Informal communication
Aalbers, R., Koppius, O., & Dolfsma, W. A. (2006). On and Off the Beaten Path: Transferring Knowledge through Formal and Informal Networks. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series.
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.
An n-Sykes, T., Venkatesh, V., & Johnson, L. (2014). Enterprise System Implementation and Employee Job Performance: Understanding the Role of Advice Networks. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 51-72.
Bearth, M. a. (2015).  Employee Contributions to Organizational Decision-Making Processes and Outcomes. Catherine University.
Bergman, C., Dellve, L., & Skagerta, K. (2016, Jun 4). Exploring communication processes in workplace meetings: A mixed methods study in a Swedish healthcare organization. Retrived from at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Blarr. (2012). Organizational Ambidexterity. Leipzig: Leipzig Graduate School of Management.
Daniel, C. O. (2018). Impact of Informal Groups on Organisational Performance. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 6(9), 686-694.
Fakhari, H (1393). Reading the definition of knowledge-based companies based on the economic conditions of the country. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6 (4), 88-67.
Fernhaber, S. A., & Patel, P. C. (2012). How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1516-1539.
Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management, 209-226.
Gilissen, T. (2019). The relationship between formal and informal coordination mechanisms and individual ambidexterity. Wageningen, Gelderland: Business Management & Organisation Group.
Good, D. & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147(5), 435–453.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.
Hamdi Kangrani, H; Ghanchehpour, D (1392). Mapping and network analysis of formal and informal relationships within the organization by network analysis method (Case study: General Department of Natural Resources of Hormozgan province). Iranian Forest Journal, 5 (1), 53-43.
Hee, O. C., Qin, D. A. H., Tan, K. O., Husin, M. M. (2019). Exploring the Impact of Communication on Employee Performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 654-658.
Jansen, J. J., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
Johnson, P., Wood, G., Brewster, C., & Brookes, M. (2009). The Rise of Post-Bureaucracy Theorists’ Fancy or Organizational Praxis? International Sociology, 24(1), 37–61.
Kashyap, V. (2020, Jun 4). Effective Communication in the Workplace: How and Why? Retrived from at: https://www.hrtechnologist.com/
Krackhardt, D. & Hanson, J. R. (2016). Informal Networks: The Company behind the Charts. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104–111.
Lamieri, M. (2009). Interactions between Formal and Informal Organizational Networks. Hershey: IGI Global.
Lalegani, S (1399). Ambidextrous impact on the performance of a high level staff, research staff of the University of Medical Sciences, Master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Faculty of Management and Accounting.
Martinez, J. I. & Jarillo, J. C. (1989). The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), 489–514.
Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating Managers’ Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.
Roberto, M. A. (2013). Why great leaders don't take yes for an answer: Managing for conflict and consensus. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Rodan, S. & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541-562.
Rogan, M. & Mors, M. L. (2014). A Network Perspective on Individual-Level Ambidexterity in Organizations. . Organization Science, 25(6), 1860–1877.
Tahmasebizadeh, Gh (1399). Principles of management (coordination). Meditation Developments, 8-1.
Zanini, M. T. F. & Migueles, C. P. (2013). Trust as an element of informal coordination and its relationship with organizational performance. Economia, 14(2), 77-87.
Zhang, J., Geare, A., & Okane, C. (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Industrial marketing management, 59,131-143.
Zhang, X. & Venkatesh, V. (2013). Explaining Job Performance: The Role of Online and Offline Workplace Communication Networks. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 695-722.
Zhou, Y. M. (2012).  Designing for Complexity: Using Divisions and Hierarchy to Manage Complex Tasks. Organization Science, 24, 2, 339–355.
Zia al-Dini, T; Poor Kiani, M; Zainuddin Meymand, Z (2015). Management and informal organization. Presented at the Second International Conference on Modern Research in Management, Economics and Accounting