مدل معنابخشی در کنترل استراتژیک سازمان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
با توجه به اهمیت کنترل استراتژیک در سازمان‌ها به صورت مشارکتی، هدف از این پژوهش، استخراج مدل معنابخشی در کنترل استراتژیک است. بر اساس ادبیات موضوع، داده‌های پژوهش از طریق چارچوبی از فرآیند سه مرحله‌ای معنابخشی در کنترل استراتژیک با اهمیت مشارکت اعضای سازمان، یعنی پایش ، تفسیر، و اقدام مشارکتی جمع‌آوری شده است. در این پژوهش، ابتدا با انجام یک مطالعه موردی در هولدینگ مپنا در مرحله کیفی، مضامین مرتبط با فرآیندها جمع‌آوری و دسته‌بندی شدند و در بخش کمی، نظرات متخصصان حوزه استراتژی در مدل استخراجی اعمال شده است. در این تحقیق، عوامل لازم برای ایجاد زمینه‌ای مناسب جهت پایش، تفسیر، و اقدام مشارکتی شناسایی شدند. علاوه بر این، اطلاعاتی که باید بررسی شوند، مواردی که باید تفسیر و تأیید شوند و اقداماتی که باید در قالب مدیریت استراتژیک مشارکتی در معنابخشی برای کنترل استراتژیک سازمانی انجام شوند، تعیین شدند. تحقیقات قبلی در رابطه با کنترل استراتژیک با دیدگاه تدوین استراتژی در سطوح بالای سازمان و سپس اجرا و کنترل آن توسط سطوح پایین‌تر سازمان انجام شده‌اند؛ درحالی‌که تحقیق حاضر به دنبال ارائه مدلی جامع است تا نشان دهد چگونه همه اعضای سازمان (چه مستقیم و چه غیرمستقیم) در کنترل استراتژیک سازمان مشارکت دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Sense-making Model in the Strategic Control of Organization

نویسندگان English

Elham Jamshidi Boroujerdi
Vahid Khashei
Mahdi Ebrahimi
Hossein Rahmanseresht
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Considering the importance of strategic control of organizations in a participative way, the purpose of this research is to derive a sense-making model in strategic control. Based on the literature, the research data is collected through a three-phase process of sense-making in strategic control with the importance of people participation, i.e. participatory scanning, interpretation, and action. In terms of methodology, at first, themes related to the processes were collected and categorized by conducting a case study in MAPNA Holding, and then the opinions of specialists have been applied in the extracted model. In this study, the necessary factors for creating a suitable environment in participative scanning, interpretation, and action were identified. In addition, the information that should be co-scanned, the materials to be interpreted, and the participative actions in sense-making for strategic control were determined. Previous research in relation to strategic control has been done with the view of formulating the strategy at the top levels of the organization and then its implementation and control by the lower levels of the organization. The current research seeks to contribute a comprehensive model to show how all organizational members participate (whether directly or indirectly) in the strategic control of the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sense-making
Strategic control
Participative information monitoring
Participative information interpretation
Participative management
1.       حافظ­نیا، محمدرضا (1380). مقدمه­ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم‌انسانی، تهران: نشر سمت.
2.      Akinola, R., & Okundalaiye, H. (2022). Management control system in multinational environment: a critical review, International Journal of Economic Behavior, 12(1), 145-158, https://doi.org/10.14276/2285-0430.3434.
3.      Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
4.      Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi/10.1177/014920639101700108.
5.      Bencherki, N., Basque, J. and Rouleau, L. (2019). Sensemaking and Open Strategy, Cambidge University Press.
6.      Bhatt, R., & Mahajan, P. (2024). Navigating the unknown: Sensemaking in VUCA environments. In Managing Uncertainty in a Digital Age (pp. 211–232). InTechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110076.
7.      Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. 
8.      Chummun, B. Z., & Nleya, L. (2023). The effect of employee involvement in strategic change on the performance of insurance companies in Zimbabwe. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(9), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16090409
9.      Corbin, J. & A. Strauss. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications.
10.  Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
11.  Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284 – 295, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277657.
12.  Dizdar, O.A. & Esen, A. (2016). Sensemaking at work: meaningful work experience for individuals and organizations, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(1), 2-17, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2013-0728.
13.  Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
14.  Ericson, M. (2010). Towards a sensed decision-making approach. Management Decision, 48(1), 132-155, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011014490.
15.  Fahey, L. & Saint-Onge, H. (2024). A sensemaking approach to strategy making: The role of the leader in times of ambiguity, Organizational Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.101027
16.  Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
17.  Gegenhuber, T. & Dobusch, L. (2017). Making an impression through openness: How open strategy-making practices change in the evolution of new ventures, Long Range Planning, 50(3), 337–354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.09.001.
18.  Gioia, D. A. & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation, Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433-448, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486479.
19.  Githinji, S.N., Munga, J. & Mbithi, M. (2024). Influence of strategic controls on the organizational performance of financial firms listed at the Nairobi Stock Exchange, International Research Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 6(2), https://www.irjp.org/index.php/irjbsm/article/view/269.
20.  Gwet, K. L. (2012). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters, Advanced Analytics, LLC.
21.  Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015, DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
22.  Heller, F., Pusic, E., Strauss, G., & Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality. Oxford University Press.
23.  Henttonen, H. (2025). Benefits of employee involvement in strategic planning (Master’s thesis, University of Vaasa). University of Vaasa. Retrieved from https://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/11111/12145
24.  Hutter, K., Nketia, B. A. & Füller, J. (2017). Falling short with participation – Different effects of ideation, commenting, and evaluating behavior on open strategizing, Long Range Planning, 50(3), 355–370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.005.
25.  Johnson, P., Daniels, K. & Huff, A. (2001). Sense making, leadership and mental models, In S. J. Zaccaro and R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership (pp. 79-104). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.  Kieran, S. J. (2022). Strategic change and the role of HR in developing organizational sensemaking capability, Human Resource Management Journal, 32(1), 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12404.
27.  Kimura, K. (2024). Strategic communication and sensemaking in innovation implementation: A qualitative study, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 19(1), pp. 67–85, https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2024-2721.
28.  Kozachenko, E., Anand, A. & Shirokova, G. (2022). Strategic responses to crisis: a review and synthesis of promising research directions, Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(4), 545-580, https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-06-2021-0092.
29.  Kulkarni, V., Cristofaro, M., & Ramamoorthy, N. (2024). Evolutionary sensemaking: A managerial capability perspective, Management Decision. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1858.
30.  Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley.
31.  Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990), A theory of goal setting and task performance, Prentice Hall.
32.  Lorange, P., M.S.F. Morton. and S. Goshal. (1986), Strategic control system, West Publishing Company.
33.  MacKay, R. B. & Costanzo, L. A. (2009). Introduction, In R. B. MacKay and L. A. Costanzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategy and foresight (pp. 1-12). Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
34.  Maitlis, S. & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward, Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125, https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.873177. 
35.  Miller, S., Wilson, D., & Hickson, D. (2004). Beyond planning: Strategies for successfully implementing strategic decisions, Long Range Planning, 37(3), 201-218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.03.003.
36.  Mintzberg, H. (1995). Strategic thinking as seeing. In B. Garratt (Ed.), Developing strategic thought: A collection of the best thinking on business strategy (pp. 79-84). London, UK: Profile Books.
37.  Nketia, B. A. (2016). The influence of open strategizing on organizational members’ commitment to strategy, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 473–483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.058.
38.  Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
39.  Okumus, F. (2003). A framework to implement strategies in organizations, Management Decision, 41(9), 871-882, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310499555.
40.  Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making, Tavistock.
41.  Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.
42.  Rasche, A., Pedersen, J. S., & Alvesson, M. (2024). Frontline employees and the politics of strategic sensemaking. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.11 08/JSMA-10-2023-0264.
43.  Sandberg, J. & Tsoukas, H. (2020). Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology, Organization Theory, 1(1), 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719879937.
44.  Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday.
45.  Skov, D., & Bjerregaard, T. (2024). Emotion work in concurrent strategic change processes: A sensemaking perspective, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.10159abstract.
46.  Tavares, R., Norberto, W. D., Damke, E. J. & Panek, L. (2023). Management Control Systems–Strategic Alignment Relations: A Study at Itaipu Binacional. BBR, Brazilian Business Review, 20(4), 443-464, https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.1079.en
47.  Tavares, M. C., Vale, J., & Costa, A. (2024). The role of decentralised managers in decision-making in a large industrial company. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090202
48.  Teulier, R. & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices, Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 308–337, https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2013.822674.
49.  Thurlow, A. & Mills, J. H. (2015). Telling tales out of school: Sensemaking and narratives of legitimacy in an organizational change process, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 246–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2014.10.002. 
50.  Tovstiga, G. (2010), Strategy in practice: A practitioner’s guide to strategic thinking. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
51.  Urquhart, C., Cheuk, B., Lam, L. & Snowden, D. (2024). Sense-making, sensemaking and sense making—A systematic review and meta-synthesis of literature in information science and education: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Association for Information Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24866. 
52.  Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing, New York, McGraw-Hill.
53.  Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, USA, Sage Publications, Inc.
54.  Wiley, N. (1988). The micro-macro problem in social theory, Sociological Theory, 6(2), 254-261, https://doi.org/10.2307/202119. 
55.  Yang, L. Guohui, S. & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Making strategy work: a literature review on the factors influencing strategy implementation", ICA Working Paper, https://www.studymode.com/essays/Making-Strategy-Work-a-Literature-Review-919707.html.
56.  Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (rev.edn), Beverly Hills, Ca, Sage.
57.  Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.), SAGE Publications.
دوره 35، شماره 120
تابستان 1405

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 دی 1404