مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول

تحلیل انتقادی مدل‌های تحول سازمانی: مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

طاها حسینی 1
امیرحسین کسرائی 2
حبیب رودساز 3

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2025.85923.4636
چکیده
تحول سازمانی همواره از موضوعات کلیدی علم مدیریت به شمار می‌رود و در طول دهه‌های گذشته مدل‌های متعددی برای تسهیل این فرایند توسعه یافته است. با وجود این تلاش‌ها، پرسش اساسی درباره میزان اثربخشی و تناسب این مدل‌ها با محیط‌های پویا و پیچیده همچنان مطرح است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد مرور نظام‌مند و بر پایه جستجوی ساختارمند در پایگاه‌های علمی معتبر، مجموعه‌ای از مدل‌های تحول سازمانی را شناسایی و تحلیل انتقادی کرده است. مرور انجام‌شده نشان داد که بسیاری از مدل‌های موجود اگرچه نقاط قوتی همچون شفافیت مفهومی و سهولت کاربرد دارند، اما در ابعادی چون انعطاف‌پذیری، جامعیت و انطباق با شرایط متغیر محیطی دچار کاستی هستند. نتایج کلی حاکی از آن است که هیچ مدل منفردی قادر به پوشش همه ابعاد تحول سازمانی نیست و بیشتر چارچوب‌ها یا بر جنبه‌های ساختاری تمرکز دارند یا بر عوامل رفتاری. بنابراین، ضرورت توسعه الگوهایی جامع، پویا و چندبعدی آشکار می‌شود؛ الگوهایی که بتوانند میان الزامات ساختاری، فرهنگی، فناورانه و انسانی پیوند برقرار کرده و پاسخگوی نیازهای تحول پایدار سازمان‌ها باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

'تحول سازمانی'
'مدل‌های تحول سازمانی'
'تحلیل انتقادی'
'مرور نظام‌مند'
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Critical Analysis of Organizational Transformation Model: A Systematic Review

نویسندگان English

Taha Hosseini 1
AmirHossein Kasrayi 2
Habib Roodsaz 3
1 Master's Student, Department of Public Administration, Allameh Tabataba'i University Tehran, Iran
2 Master's Student, Department of Public Administration, Tehran University Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Organizational transformation has long been a central concern in management studies, and over past decades numerous models have been proposed to facilitate this process. Despite such efforts, critical questions remain regarding the effectiveness, comprehensiveness, and contextual relevance of these frameworks in today’s turbulent and complex environments. This study adopts a systematic review approach, based on a structured search of reputable academic databases, to identify and critically analyze a set of widely cited organizational transformation models. The review reveals that while many models exhibit strengths such as conceptual clarity and practical applicability, they simultaneously suffer from notable shortcomings. In particular, they often lack flexibility, holistic integration, and the ability to adapt to rapidly changing organizational conditions. Overall, the findings suggest that no single model adequately addresses all dimensions of organizational transformation. Most frameworks emphasize either structural or behavioral aspects, but rarely both in balance. Consequently, the study highlights the necessity of developing more comprehensive, multidimensional, and dynamic models that effectively integrate structural, cultural, technological, and human factors to ensure sustainable organizational transformation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

'Organizational Transformation'
'Organizational Transformation Models'
'Critical Analysis'
'Systematic Review'
  1. مرادی، سالار. (1403). سنجش تحول سازمانی مبتنی بر معماری در ساختار مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس.پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول، 16(بهار و تابستان 1403).‎
  2. Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 697-713.
  3. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human relations, 1(1), 5-41.
  4. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1989). Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(3), 194-204.
  5. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press.
  6. Burnes, B. (2004). Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics. Pearson Education.
  7. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership(Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change in: Harvard Business Review. On Change HBR’s, 10.
  9. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2021). Organization development and change (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com
  10. Burke, W. W. (2023). Organization change: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of management, 18(3), 523-545.
  12. Hayes, J. (2022). The theory and practice of change management. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  13. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers.
  14. Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: a model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci.
  15. Gabriela-Livia, C. (2021, May). EFQM Excellence Model–European Foundation for Quality Management. In 6th International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management (ERMM 2021)(pp. 301-303). Atlantis Press.
  16. Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Waterman Jr, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business horizons, 23(3), 14-26.
  18. Weisbord, M. R. (1976). Organizational diagnosis: Six places to look for trouble with or without a theory. Group & Organization Studies, 1(4), 430-447.
  19. Greiner, L. E. (1989). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow(pp. 373-387). Macmillan Education UK.
  20. Leavitt, H. J. (2013). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In Handbook of Organizations (RLE: Organizations)(pp. 1144-1170). Routledge.
  21. Canterino, F., Cirella, S., & Shani, A. B. (2018). Leading organizational transformation: an action research study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 15-28.
  22. Kovynyov, I., Buerck, A., & Mikut, R. (2021). Design of transformation initiatives implementing organisational agility: an empirical study. SN Business & Economics, 1(6), 79.
  23. Miake-Lye, I. M., Delevan, D. M., Ganz, D. A., Mittman, B. S., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Unpacking organizational readiness for change: an updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments. BMC health services research, 20, 1-13.
  24. Sullivan, K., Kashiwagi, D., & Lines, B. (2011, September). Organizational change models: a critical review of change management processes. In RICS Construction and Property Conference(p. 302).
  25. Wolf, J. H., & Wolf, K. S. (2013). The Lake Wobegon effect: are all cancer patients above average?. The Milbank Quarterly, 91(4), 690-728.
  26. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
  27. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
  28. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Bmj, 339.
  29. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70(1), 747-770.
  30. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.
  31. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews.
  33. Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’in literature reviews in IS. Journal of information technology, 30(2), 161-173.
  34. Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (1999). Doing critical management research. sage.
  35. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw Hills.
  36. Martusewicz, J., Wierzbic, A., & Łukaszewicz, M. (2024). Strategic Transformation and Sustainability: Unveiling the EFQM Model 2025. Sustainability, 16(20), 9106.
  37. Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., & Davis, D. (Eds.). (2013). Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. John Wiley & Sons.
  38. Carlos Bou‐Llusar, J., Escrig‐Tena, A. B., Roca‐Puig, V., & Beltrán‐Martín, I. (2005). To what extent do enablers explain results in the EFQM excellence model? An empirical study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(4), 337-353.
  39. Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Relationships between the EFQM model criteria: a study in Spanish universities. Total quality management & business excellence, 16(6), 741-770.
  40. Appelbaum, S. H., Habashy, S., Malo, J. L., & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model. Journal of Management development, 31(8), 764-782.
  41. Kotter, J. (2010). Kotter’s 8-step change model. Mind Tools. Retrieved from http://www. mindtools. com/pages/article/newPPM_82. htm.
  42. Appel, H., Ash, S., & Mading, M. (2025). Enabling Foresight Readiness: Exploring the Role of the Practitioner Through Multiple Lenses.
  43. Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford university press.
  44. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  45. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2015). Changing organizational culture: Cultural change work in progress. Routledge.
  46. Channon, D. F., & Caldart, A. A. (2015). McKinsey 7S model. Wiley encyclopedia of management, 1-1.
  47. (n.d.). The Prosci ADKAR® Model. Retrieved from https://www.prosci.com/methodology/adkar
  48. Angtyan, H. (2019). ADKAR model in change management. International Review of Management and Business Research, 8(2), 179-182.
  49. Vakola, M. (2014). What's in there for me? Individual readiness to change and the perceived impact of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 195-209.
  50. Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of management, 39(1), 110-135.
  51. Burnes, B. (2017). Managing Change (7. utg.).
  52. Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of management, 25(3), 293-315.
  53. Burnes, B., & Jackson, P. (2011). Success and failure in organizational change: An exploration of the role of values. Journal of change management, 11(2), 133-162.
  54. Pugh, D. S. (Ed.). (1971). Organization theory: Selected readings(Vol. 126). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  55. Carnall, B. S. S. S. C., Colin/Senior Carnall (Barbar), & Swailes, S. (2020). Organizational Change.
  56. Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1992). Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  57. Weisbord, M. R. (1987). Productive workplaces: Organizing and managing for dignity, meaning and community. Jossey-Bass.
  58. McLean, G. (2005). Organization development: Principles, processes, performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  59. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford University Press.

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 01 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 آبان 1404

صفحه اصلی

اعضای هیئت تحریریه

ارسال مقاله

هزینه بررسی مقاله ها

تماس با ما