نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت دولتی گرایش طراحی سازمان های دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، رشت، گیلان، ایران

3 دانشیار، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با هدف بررسی تاثیر کرونیسم سازمانی بر سرمایه اجتماعی با نقش میانجی طرد سازمانی و نقش تعدیلگر بی نزاکتی در محیط کار انجام شده است. تحقیق حاضر به لحاظ روش کمی-پیمایشی و به لحاظ هدف کاربردی می باشد. گردآوری داده ها به دو روش کتابخانه ای و میدانی و با استفاده از ابزار پرسشنامه استاندارد صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل کلیه کارکنان شهرداری رشت می باشد و حجم نمونه نیز برابر 288 نفر است که به روش در دسترس نمونه گیری شده اند. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها نیز از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی (SEM) و نرم افزار Smart PLS استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصل تحقیق نشان داد که کرونیسم سازمانی بر سرمایه اجتماعی تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد. همچنین کرونیسم سازمانی بر طرد سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. بعلاوه مشخص گردید که طرد سازمانی بر سرمایه اجتماعی تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد. همچنین نقش میانجی طرد سازمانی در رابطه بین کرونیسم سازمانی و سرمایه اجتماعی مورد تایید قرار گرفت. نتایج همچنین نشان داد که بی نزاکتی در محیط کار در رابطه بین کرونیسم سازمانی و طرد سازمانی و رابطه کرونیسم سازمانی و سرمایه اجتماعی نقش تعدیلگر دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Organizational Cronyism on Social Capital

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Sadegh Hassanzadeh Pasikhani 1
  • tayebeh bina 2
  • Tooraj hassanzade Samarin 3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Public Administration, Design of Government Organizations, Payam Noor University, Rasht, Gilan, Iran

3 Associated Professor., Faculty of social science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of organizational cronyism on social capital with the mediating role of organizational exclusion and the moderating role of incivility in the workplace. The research method is quantitative-survey and applied in terms of purpose. Data collection was carried out in two library and field methods using a standard questionnaire. The statistical population of the study includes all employees of Rasht Municipality, and the sample size is 288 people who were sampled using the convenience method. Structural equation modeling with the partial least squares (SEM) approach and Smart PLS software were used to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that organizational cronyism has a negative and significant effect on social capital. Organizational cronyism also has a positive and significant effect on organizational exclusion. In addition, it was determined that organizational exclusion has a negative and significant effect on social capital. The mediating role of organizational exclusion in the relationship between organizational cronyism and social capital was also confirmed. The results also showed that incivility in the workplace has a moderating role in the relationship between organizational cronyism and organizational exclusion and the relationship between organizational cronyism and social capital.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational cronyism
  • Organizational ostracism
  • Social capital
  • workplace Incivility
  1. حسن زاده پسیخانی،محمد صادق؛ باقرزاده خداشهری، راضیه(1397)؛ تأثیر سرمایۀ اجتماعی بر توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی کارکنان: بررسی نقش میانجی بهزیستی ذهنی، مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، دوره 5(1) ،صص 111-134doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.257335.1599
  2. حسینی، ابوالحسن؛ قربانی پاجی، عقیل و اکبری، امیر. (1398). اثر طرد‌شدگی در محیط کار بر رفتارهای محیط‌ کار با نقش میانجی عزت‌نفس سازمانی و تعدیلگر عدالت‌ سازمانی. "مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی", 17(4), 569-586.doi: 10.22059/jomc.2019.258195.1007532
  3. سپهوند،مسعود؛ حکاک،محمد؛سپهوند، رضا؛نظرپوری، امیرهوشنگ(1401) طراحی و تبیین مدل شکل گیری کرونیسم در سازمان،فرآیند مدیریت توسعه،35(4)، صص39-73doi:10.61186/jmdp.35.4.39
  4. رضایی، شمس الدین و منظمی، امیرحسین. (1400). بررسی رابطة بین طردشدگی در محیط کار و عملکرد شغلی با نقش میانجی سرمایة روان‌شناختی در کارکنان ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان ایلام. مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی, 10(38), 133-146.doi: 10.22089/spsyj.2021.10273.2136
  5. موسوی، سید نجم الدین؛ سپهوند، رضا؛ فتحی چگنی، فریبرز(1402) کرونیسم سازمانی و اهمال کاری: تحلیل اثر بازدارندگی سرمایه اجتماعی در سازمانهای دولتی، مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، 10(1)، 31-45doi: 10.22059/jscm.2022.334711.2232
  6. Abubakar, A. M., Megeirhi, H. A., & Shneikat, B. (2018). Tolerance for workplace incivility, employee cynicism and job search behavior. The Service Industries Journal, 38(9-10), 629-643. DOI:1080/02642069.2017.1420171
  7. Arasli, H., Bavik, A., & Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four and five star hotels in Northern Cyprus. International journal of sociology and social policy, 26(7/8), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610680399
  8. Bedi, A. (2021), “No herd for black sheep: a meta-analytic review of the predictors and outcomes of workplace ostracism”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 861-904. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12238
  9. Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., & Akoorie, M. (2017). Cronyism as a constraint in social capital development: investigating dark side of social relation. Academy of Management Proceedings ,Vol. 2017, No. 1, 10751. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10751abstract
  10. Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey
  11. Blau, G., & Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 595-614. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26822
  12. Chaman, S., Bhatti, I., & Hussain, A. (2021). Dealing with workplace ostracism: The role of psychological capital and political skill in employee job outcomes. International Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(4), 75-87.
  13. Chen, L., Zheng, W., Yang, B., & Bai, S. (2016). Transformational leadership, social capital & organizational innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 843-859. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2015-0157
  14. Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations: Evidence and impact, Journal of management, 39(6), 1579-1605.https://doi.org/1177/0149206311418835
  15. Daniels, S. R., & Jordan, S. L. (2019). The Effect of Paternalism on Incivility: Exploring Incivility Climate as an Important Boundary C Journal of Leadership & OrganizationalStudies, 26(2), 190-203.https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818795817
  16. Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance, Academy of management review, 26(3), 446-456.https://doi.org/10.2307/259187
  17. Dijkstra, M.T., De Dreu, C.K., Evers, A. and van Dierendonck, D. (2009), “Passive responses to interpersonal conflict at work amplify employee strain”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802510880
  18. Ferris, D.L., Brown, D.J., Berry, J.W. and Lian, H. (2008), “The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 13-48. DOI: 1037/a0012743
  19. Fang, R., McAllister, D. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2017). Down but not out: Newcomers can compensate for low vertical access with strong horizontal ties and favorable core self‐evaluations, Personnel Psychology, 70(3), 517-555.https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12177
  20. Fonti, F., & Maoret, M. (2016). The direct and indirect effects of core and peripheral social capital on organizational performance, Strategic management journal, 37(8), 1765-1786. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2409
  21. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review,25, 161-178.https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
  22. Greco, L.M., Whitson, J.A., O’Boyle, E.H., Wang, C.S. and anf Kim, J. (2019), “An eye for an eye? A meta-analysis of negative reciprocity in organizations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 104 No. 9, pp. 1117-1143.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000396
  23. Hitlan, R. T., & Noel, J. (2009). The influence of workplace exclusion and personality on counterproductive work behaviours: An interactionist perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology18(4), 477-502.https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903025028
  24. Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., & Li, J. (J.). (2022). I’m broken inside but smiling outside: When does workplace ostracism promote pro-social behavior? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 101,1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103088
  25. Ilies, R., Guo, C. Y., Lim, S., Yam, K. C., & Li, X. (2020). Happy but uncivil? Examining when and why positive affect leads to incivility, Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 595-614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04097-1
  26. Jang Eunmi , Chen Xing (2022). How Can We Make a Sustainable Workplace? Workplace Ostracism, Employees’ Well-Being via Need Satisfaction and Moderated Mediation Role of Authentic Leadership ,,sustainability ,MDPI, 14, 2869 pp:1-16https://doi.org/3390/su14052869
  27. Jawahar, I. M., Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., & Mohammed, Z. J. (2021). Does organizational cronyism undermine social capital? Testing the mediating role of workplace ostracism and the moderating role of workplace incivility, Career Development International, 26(5), 657-677.

       https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2020-0228

  1. Keefer, P. and Knack, S. (2008), “Social capital, social norms and the new institutional economics”, in Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, New York, pp. 701-725. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25092-1_28
  2. Leung, A.S., Wu, L.Z., Chen, Y.Y. and Young, M.N. (2011), “The impact of workplace ostracism in service organizations”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 30, pp. 836-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.004
  3. Mao, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, C. and Zhang (2018), “Why am I ostracized and how would I react?–A review of workplace ostracism research”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 35, pp. 745-767.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9538-8
  4. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
  5. Paşamehmetoğlu, A., Guzzo, R. F., & Guchait, P. (2022). Workplace ostracism: Impact on social capital, organizational trust, and service recovery performance, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 119-126.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.01.007
  6. Peng, A.C. and Zeng, W. (2017), “Workplace ostracism and deviant and helping behaviors: the moderating role of 360 degree feedback”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 833-855.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2169
  7. Penhaligon, N.L., Louis, W.R. and Restubog, S.L.D. (2009), “Emotional anguish at work: the mediating role of perceived rejection on workgroup mistreatment and affective outcomes”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 34-45. DOI: 10.1037/a0013288
  8. Porath, C. and Pearson, C. (2013), “The price of incivility”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 91, pp. 114-146.
  9. Robinson, S. L., O’Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, 39(1), 203-231.DOI: 10.1177/0149206312466141
  10. Saeed, M. N. (2022). Does psychological detachment, behavioral integrity and emotional exhaustion impact the relationship between organizational nepotism-cronyism and unitarism social capital?. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4), 76-95DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/gjhrm.2013
  11. Schilpzand, P. and Huang, L. (2018), “When and how experienced incivility dissuades proactive performance: an integration of Sociometer and self-identity orientation perspectives”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 103 No. 8, pp. 828-841. DOI: 1037/apl0000303
  12. Scott, K.L., Restubog, S.L.D. and Zagenczyk, T.J. (2013), “A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98 No. 1, pp. 37-52.             https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030135
  13. shaheen, S., Abrar, M., Saleem, S., Shabbir, R., & Zulfiqar, S. (2021). “Linking organizational cronyism to deviant workplace behavior: Testing the mediating role of employee negligence in Pakistani higher education institutions”, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2021(2), pp. 1-23.DOI:1080/13603124.2020.1869313
  14. Shaheen, S., Bari, M.W., Hameed, F., & Anwar, M. M. (2019). “Organizational Cronyism as an Antecedent of Ingratiation: Mediating Role of Relational Psychological Contract”, Frontiers in Psychology, 10:1609, pp. 1-29.doi: 3389/fpsyg.2019.01609
  15. Shaheen, S., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2017). “Examining Organizational Cronyism as an Antecedent of Workplace Deviance in Public Sector Organizations”, Public Personnel Management, 46(3), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017716655
  16. Turhan, M. (2014). Organizational cronyism: A scale development and validation from the perspective of teachers, Journal of business ethics, 123, 295-308.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3
  17. Zhang, J., & Gill, C. (2019). Leader–follower guanxi: an invisible hand of cronyism in Chinese management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(3), 322-344. DOI: 1111/1744-7941.12191
  18. Yan, Y. and Bei, H. (2009), “The antecedents of organizational cronyism: management and service science”, MASS’09 International Conference, 20– 22 September 2009, IEEE. DOI:1109/ICMSS.2009.5304810
  19. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641