مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

تفاهم نامه

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمای نگارش

فایل ها

داوران

داوران 1402

داوران سال 1401

داوران سال1400

داوران سال1399

داوران سال1398

راهنمای ثبت نام درPublons

شیوه نامه ارزیابی نشریات علمی

آیین نامه نشریات علمی

آیین نامه اجرایی قانون پیگیری و مقابله با تقلب در تهیه آثار علمی

بینش های خودساماندهی برای تغییر سازمانی: یک مرور نظام مند ادبیات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیارگروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

4 عضو هیات علمی / پژوهشکده علوم اقتصادی / دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی / تهران / ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، یافتن بینش های خودساماندهی برای فهم تغییر و تحول سازمانی بوده است. بدین منظور و به جهت یافتن پاسخ سئوال پژوهش، از روش مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات بهره گرفته شد. جامعه آماری، شامل کلیۀ مقالات کیفی و کمی مرتبط با موضوع پژوهش در بازۀ زمانی 2000 تا 2024 بوده؛ که با جستجو در پایگاه های اطلاعاتی علمی، تعداد 83 مقاله مشخص شدند. پس از طی مراحل ارزیابی کیفیت مقالات، تعداد 32 مقاله مرتبط جهت پاسخ گویی به سئوال پژوهش انتخاب شدند. داده‌های حاصل از مقالات و ادبیات موضوع، با استفاده از راهبرد تحلیل مضمون، تحلیل و ترکیب شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که خودساماندهی حاوی بینش هایی برای تغییر و تحول سازمانی هست. اول) اقدامات ترکیبی عامل های فردی، موجد تغییر سازمانی است؛ دوم) اصول خودساماندهی، انگارۀ تغییر برنامه ریزی شده و نیت مند را رد می کند؛ سوم) سازمان ها تمایل دارند به صورت پویا، غیرخطی و خودسامانده، تغییر و تحول یابند؛ چهارم) ساختار منعطف؛ لازمۀ تغییر خودسامانده است؛ پنجم) مشارکت کارکنان؛ لازمۀ تغییر خودسامانده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

self-organization insights for organizational change: A systematic literature review

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rouhollah Honarmand 1
  • Habib Roodsaz 2
  • Reza Vaezi 3
  • Mohammadreza Saadi 4

1 Ph.D. Student of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

4 Economic Sciences Institute / Allameh Tabatabaei University / Tehran / Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of the current research was to find self-organizing insights to understand organizational change and transformation. For this purpose and in order to find the answer to the research question, a systematic literature review method was used. The statistical population includes all qualitative and quantitative articles related to the research topic in the period from 2000 to 2024; By searching in scientific databases, 83 articles were identified. After evaluating the quality of the articles, 32 related articles were selected to answer the research question. The data obtained from the articles and literature were analyzed and combined using the theme analysis strategy. The research results showed that self-organization contains insights for organizational change and transformation. First) the combined actions of individual factors bring about organizational change; Second) the principles of self-organization reject the idea of planned and intentional change; Third) Organizations tend to change and evolve in a dynamic, non-linear and self-organizing manner; 4) flexible structure, is required for Self-organized change; Fifth) employee participation, is required for Self-organized change.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational Change
  • Organizational Transformation
  • Self Organization
  • Systematic review
مراجع
  1. Abatecola, Gianpaolo and Alberto Surace, (2020), Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability, Sustainability 2020, 12, 10629; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410629
  2. Amagoh, Francis, (2008), Perspectives on Organizational Change: Systems and Complexity Theories, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 13(3). https://innovation.cc/wp-content/uploads/2008_13_3_3_amagoh_org-change.pdf
  3. Anderson , Philip, (1999) Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science 10(3):216-232. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
  4. Balogun, J. (2006). Managing change: Steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 39(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.010
  5. Bamford, D. R., & Forrester, P. L. (2003). Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(5), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310471857
  6. Beeson, Ian and Chris Davis, (2000), Emergence and accomplishment in organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13 No. 2, 2000, pp. 178-189. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/fac_publications/112/
  7. Bousquet, Antoine, & Simon Curtis (2011) Beyond models and metaphors: complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, https://www.academia.edu/494608/Beyond_Models_and_Metaphors_Complexity_Theory_Systems_Thinking_and_International_Relations
  8. Bovaird, Tony. (2008) Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptive Systems, Public Management Review, 10:3, 319-340. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v10y2008i3p319-340.html
  9. Boyatzis, Richard. E. (2008). LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FROM A COMPLEXITY PERSPECTIVE. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, No. 4, 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.60.4.298
  10. Burnes, Bernard, 2004, Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future?, Journal of Change Management, 4:4, 309-325, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228990434_Kurt_Lewin_and_complexity_theories_Back_to_the_future
  11. Burnes, Bernard, 2005, Complexity theories and organizational change, International Journal of Management Reviews Volume 7 Issue 2 pp.73–90.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227949539_Complexity_theories_and_organizational_change
  12. Cairney, Paul, 2012, Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy, POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW: 2012 VOL 10, 346–358. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x
  13. Cseh, M., & Coningham, B. (2019). Culturally Informed Evidence-Based Organizational Change and Development Through the Lens of Complexity Theory. In R. Hamlin, A. Ellinger, & J. Jones (Ed.), Evidence-Based Initiatives for Organizational Change and Development (pp. 140-154). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6155-2.ch007
  14. Cunha, Miguel Pina e and Arme´nio Rego, 2010, Complexity, simplicity, simplexity, European Management Journal, 28, 85– 94. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v28y2010i2p85-94.html
  15. Dahlberg, Ramus, 2015, Resilience and complexity: Conjoining the Discourses of Two Contested Concepts, Journal of Current Cultural Research, Volume 7: 541-557. https://www.academia.edu/47263818/Resilience_and_Complexity_Conjoining_the_Discourses_of_Two_Contested_Concepts
  16. Dawkins, Cedric E. and James R. Barker, 2018, A Complexity Theory Framework of Issue Movement, journal of Business & Society 1–41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323810710_A_Complexity_Theory_Framework_of_Issue_Movement
  17. Eppel, Elizabeth Anne & Mary Lee Rhodes (2018) Complexity theory and public management: a ‘becoming’ field, Public Management Review, 20:7, 949-959. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v20y2018i7p949-959.html
  18. Farazmand, Ali, 2009, Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty-First Century, Public Administration Review, November | December 2009, pp. 1007-1020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229698851_Building_Administrative_Capacity_for_the_Age_of_Rapid_Globalization_A_Modest_Prescription_for_the_Twenty-First_Century
  19. Ferdig, Mary A. James D. Ludema. 2015, "TRANSFORMATIVE INTERACTIONS: QUALITIES OF CONVERSATION THAT HEIGHTEN THE VITALITY OF SELF-ORGANIZING CHANGE" In Research in Organizational Change and Development. Published online: 08 Mar 2015; 169-205. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241700157_TRANSFORMATIVE_INTERACTIONS_QUALITIES_OF_CONVERSATION_THAT_HEIGHTEN_THE_VITALITY_OF_SELF-ORGANIZING_CHANGE
  20. Garlick, J. (2016). Not So Simple: Complexity Theory and the Rise of China *. China Report, 52(4), 284–305. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310478446_Not_So_Simple_Complexity_Theory_and_the_Rise_of_China
  21. Gerrits, Berry, Wouter van Heeswijk, and Martijn Mes, (2023), Towards self-organizing logistics in transportation: a literature, review and typology, International Transactions in Operational Research published. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13408
  22. Graetz, F. and Smith, A. C. T. (2010), "Managing organizational change: a philosophies of change approach", Journal of Change Management, 10 No. 2, pp. 135-154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228642907_Managing_Organizational_Change_A_Philosophies_of_Change_Approach
  23. GROBMAN, GARY M., 2005, COMPLEXITY THEORY: A NEW WAY TO LOOK AT ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3/4 (FALL 2005-WINTER 2006), pp. 350-382. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288239
  24. Haken, Hermann, and Juval Portugali. 2021. "Information and Self-Organization II: Steady State and Phase Transition" Entropy 23, no. 6: 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060707
  25. Hongtao Yi, 2017, Network Structure and Governance Performance: What Makes a Difference?, Public Administration Review, Vol. 78, Iss. 2, pp. 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12886
  26. Houchin, K, and D. MacLean, (2005), Complexity Theory and Strategic Change: an Empirically Informed Critique, British Journal of Management, Vol. 16, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00427.x
  27. Hudson, Christopher G. PhD (2005) The Dynamics of Self- Organization, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10:4, 17-38, DOI: 1300/J137v10n04_02
  28. Islam, Shafiqul, Lawrence Susskind, 2018, Using complexity science and negotiation theory to resolve boundarycrossing water issues, Journal of Hydrology, N 562. pages 589–598. DOI:1016/J.JHYDROL.2018.04.020
  29. Jimenez-Andrade, Jose Luis, Ricardo Arencibia-Jorg, Miguel Robles-Perez, Julia Taguena, Tzipe Govezensky, Humberto Carrillo-Calvet, Rafael A. Barri, and Kimmo Kaski (2024), Organizational changes and research performance: A multidimensional assessment, Research Evaluation, 2024, 00, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae005
  30. Kallemeyn , Leanne M., Jori N. Hall, and Emily Gates, (2019), Exploring the Relevance of Complexity Theory for Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872423
  31. Kallemeyn , Leanne M., Jori N. Hall, and Emily Gates, (2019), Exploring the Relevance of Complexity Theory for Mixed to Ensure Employee Participation, Journal of Change Management, DOI: 10.1080/14697017.2020.1755341
  32. Klijn, Erik-Hans (2008): Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What's New?, Public Management Review, 10:3, 299-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002675
  33. Lauser, B. (2010). Post-merger integration and change processes from a complexity perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(1), 6–27. https://www.proquest.com/docview/208668415?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
  34. Lee, M.E. (1997) From Enlightenment to Chaos: toward nonmodern social theory, in R. A. Eve, S. Horsfall & M. F. Lee (Eds) Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: myths, models and theories (pp. 15-29). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  35. Lowell, K. R. (2016). An application of complexity theory for guiding organizational change. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 19(3-4), 148–181.DOI: 1037/mgr0000044
  36. Luoma, M 2006, ‘A Play of Four Arenas: How Complexity Can Serve Management Development’, Management Learning, 37, no1, pp 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606058136
  37. Maes, G. and Van Hootegem, G. (2011), "Toward a dynamic description of the attributes of organizational change", in Shani, A. B., Woodmann, R. and Pasmore, W. A. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development. Emerald, Bingley, UK, pp. 191-231. https://www.academia.edu/21904470/TOWARD_A_DYNAMIC_DESCRIPTION_OF_THE_ATTRIBUTES_OF_ORGANIZATIONAL_CHANGE
  38. Maes, G. and Van Hootegem, G. (2019), "A systems model of organizational change", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2017-0268
  39. Mason, Roger B. (2008), Management actions, attitudes to change and perceptions of the external environment. A complexity theory approach, Journal of General Management 34 (1) : 37-53. https://wlv.openrepository.com/handle/2436/74777
  40. Morrison, Keith, 2010, Complexity Theory, School Leadership and Management: Questions for Theory and Practice, Educational Management Administration & Leadership 38(3) 374–393. DOI: 1177/1741143209359711
  41. Nikolaou, I., Gouras, A., Vakola, M., & Bourantis, D. (2007). Selecting change agents: Exploring traits and skills in a simulated environment. Journal of Change Management, 7(3/4), 291313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697010701779173
  42. Osifo, Samuel Jesuorobo and Omorodion Omoregbe, 2011, ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE WITH THE SYSTEM AND COMPLEXITY THEORIES IN MIND, Knowledge Review Volume 22 No 2, pp. 52_58. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE-WITH-THE-SYSTEM-AND-THEORIES-Osifo-Omoregbe/6feb095118c69b1d6eebd9be07a6373900404c0e
  43. Phelps, Renata & Stewart Hase (2002) Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connections, Educational Action Research, 10:3, 507-524. DOI: 1080/09650790200200198
  44. Savini, Federico, 2017, Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12469
  45. Shir, Nadav and Carol D. Ryff, (2022), Entrepreneurship, Self-Organization, and Eudaimonic Well- Being: A Dynamic Approach, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practiceو 2022, Vol. 46(6) 1658–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211013798
  46. Smith, Aaron Ct & Clare E Humphries (2004) Complexity Theory as a Practical Management Tool: A Critical Evaluation, Organization Management Journal, 1:2, 91-106, DOI: 10.1057/omj.2004.18
  47. Smith, Aaron Ct (2004). Complexity theory and change management in sport organizations. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 6. pp. 70-79. https://journal.emergentpublications.com/Article/da88f86a-7a71-44dd-83db-e7568af79843/academic
  48. Speakman, Mark. Richard Sharpley, 2012, A chaos theory perspective on destination crisis management: Evidence from Mexico, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 67–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.05.003
  49. Stacey, Ralph D, 1995, THE SCIENCE OF COMPLEXITY: AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC CHANGE PROCESSES, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, 477-495. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250160606
  50. Stacey, Ralph D, 2011, “Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organizations”, Pearson, Sixth Edition. https://www.amazon.com/Strategic-Management-Organisational-Dynamics-organisations/dp/0273725599
  51. Sundarasaradula, D., Hasan, H., Walker, D. S., & Tobias, A. M. (2005). Self-organization, evolutionary and revolutionary change in organizations. Strategic Change, 14(7), 367–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.739
  52. Teisman, Geert R. & Erik-Hans Klijn (2008): Complexity Theory and Public Management, Public Management Review, 10:3, 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002451
  53. Turner, John R and Rose M. Baker, (2019), Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences, journal of Systems, 7, 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004
  54. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  55. Zhengang GUO, Yingfeng ZHANG, Sichao LIU, Xi Vincent WANG, Lihui WANG, 2023, Exploring self-organization and self-adaption for smart manufacturing complex networks,  Front. Eng. Manag. 2023, 10(2): 206–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0225-1
مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول
دوره 33، شماره 114
دی 1403
صفحه 33-72
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 26 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 31 اردیبهشت 1403
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار