Authors

1 Professor of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University

2 Associate professor of Public Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

3 Phd Student of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

Abstract

The aim of present research is to explore the environmental factors that affect the Iran’s parliament members’ perceptions in legislation process. To conduct the study, grounded theory approach was used. Judgmental Sampling method was applied and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. We gathered data using semi-structural interviews with sixteen parliament members and collecting parliament related documents. 53 codes, 9 concepts and 3 categories were emerged during coding process. The relationship between categories was described through six propositions which were grouped in two main propositions. The results show that the environmental factors that affect parliament members’ perception consist of two categories of external and internal environmental factors. External environmental factors include political-legal pressures, economic pressures, social-cultural pressures and technological pressures. Internal environmental factors include organizational structure and procedures, and organizational culture. Perception was the core category of the research which consists of two sub-categories of direct and indirect cognition and three concepts of sense-making, sense-giving and sense-breaking

Keywords

افجۀ، سید علی اکبر، (1385)، مبانی فلسفی و تئوریهای رهبری و رفتار سازمانی، انتشارات سمت، تهران.
حیدری، علی. سیدکلالی، نادر. (1395). ارائه مدل مزیت رقابتی شرکتهای مشاوره مدیریت بر اساس نظریه قابلیت‌های پویا. فصلنامه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه تهران. دوره 8، شماره 2. ص 338-317.
        Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). "The other “authoritarian personality”". In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 30. (pp. 47–91). New York: Academic Press.
       Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeachs , "equality-freedom model: tow dimensional value in a one dimensional world". Journal of social issues, 50, 67-94
         Brosch, T. Sander, D. (2013)." Neurocognitive Mechanisms underlying Value- based decision making: from core values to economic value. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience", 7, 398.
         Bullock, John G. (2011). “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an InformedElectorate.” American Political Science Review 105(3):496–515.
         Colin F. Camerer. (2009). “Progress in Behavioral Game Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 167–88.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990)" Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria". Qualitative Sociology, 13(1): 3–21.
         Costa-Gomes, M., V.P. Crawford and B. Broseta. (2010). “Cognition and Behaviorin Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study.” Econometrica69(5):1193–1235
         Crane, Tim (2005): "The Problem of Perception’."Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed 1.9.2010.
Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). "Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes". Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(12), Pp.802-814.
  Davis, Gordan Bitter and Margrethe H. Olson (1985), Management Information Systems: Conceptual foundations, Structure and Development, Singapore: MacGraw-Hill Book Co, pp. 169 -171.
         Duckitt, J. (2001)."A dual-process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice". In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 33. (pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
         Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
         Glaser, B. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.
         Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475
Gregory, Richard. (2000).  Perception. Zangwill. pp. 598–601.
         Jost, J. Basevich, E. and Dickson, S. (2016).  "The Place of Value In a World of Politics: personality, motivation, and ideology". Journal of social issues 4(22), 131-146.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). "Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology". Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126-136.
         Pickens, J. (2014)." Organizational Behavior in Health Care". Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA.
        Putnam (Eds.), (1971). The Sage handbook of organizational discourse. (pp. 62–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
         Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2011). "Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future". Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 234-279.
         Simon, Herbert A. (1955). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” The QuarterlyJournal of Economics 69(1):99–118